Diese Seite ist für Browser optimiert, die Web-Standards unterstützen. Andere Browser zeigen lediglich eine vereinfachte Version an, ermöglichen jedoch ebenfalls den Zugang zu allen Texten dieser Site.

Medical tests Medical tests
MIGRAINE CLASSIFICATION   MIGRAINE HEADACHE   MIGRAINE AURA   MIGRAINE ART    
Printer friendly version print page
search

Medical tests

Diagnostic work-up of persistent perception disorder/persistent aura without infarction

Obligatory tests:

Ophthalmologic examination
Neurological examination
Psychiatric examination
Thorough headache history and family history
Thorough drug history (including illegal drugs, especially hallucinogens: LSD, Ecstasy, mushrooms, other?)
CAT or MRI of head

Facultative tests:

EEG
Evoked potentials
Routine blood work
Lumbar puncture (spinal tap)

Unnecessary for individual diagnostic purposes:

SPECT
PET
fMRI
qEEG

A medical test is any kind of diagnostic procedure performed for health reasons. Each subject with a leading complaint of persisting perception disturbances needs a full diagnostic work-up including ophthalmologic, neurological and psychiatric examinations as well as CAT or MRI scans of the brain. The most important medical test for the diagnosis of persistent aura without infarction is the taking of the medical history, notably the history and family history of migraine and drug use, obtaining a detailed account of the chronology of symptoms as experienced by the patient.

Blind men and an elephant (see here).

Of the 60 subjects with a diagnosis of definite persistent aura without infarction, only 37 reported having visited one or more ophthalmologists (subjects #1, #20, #23, #30, #45, #52, #75, #86, #120, #136, #138, #141, #142, #145, #147, #157, #162, #171, #180, #185, #189, #200, #217, #228, #230, #233, #234, #258, #264, #265, #273, #276, #277, #284, #300, #296, #301), 34 one or more neurologists (subjects #1, #8, #20, #23, #30, #45, #52, #73, #80, #85, #86, #141, #145, #147, #152, #156, #159, #162, #167, #168, #169, #171, #180, #189, #254, #258, #264, #265, #273, #276, #277, #284, #300, #301), 12 an ENT doctor (subjects #23, #45, #145, #153, #162, #172, #189, #228, #264, #265, #273, #296), 8 a neuro-ophthalmologist (subjects #52, #138, #142, #145, #159, #179, #277, #301), 7 a "Lyme literate" doctor (subjects #142, #147, #171, #179, #183, #200, #264), 3 an oto-neurologist (subjects #157, #172, #185), 2 a psychiatrist (subjects #73, #175), 2 a child psychiatrist (subjects #45, #273), 2 a psychologist (subject #171, #276), 2 a chiropractist (subject #264, #276) and each one an orthopaedist (subject #265), a child psychologist (subject #235), an optometrist (subject #147) and an optician (subject #80), respectively. Overall, only 50 subjects (#1, #8, #20, #23, #30, #45, #52, #73, #75, #80, #85, #86, #120, #136, #138, #141, #142, #145, #147, #152, #153, #156, #157, #159, #162, #167, #168, #169, #171, #179, #180, #185, #189, #200, #217, #228, #230, #233, #235, #254, #258, #264, #265, #273, #276, #277, #284, #300, #296, #301) – 83,3 % of the sample - had been examined by a medical specialist, indicating an insufficient health care utilization by sufferers from persistent aura.

HenrikKJ [subject#074], Normal MRI images, 2008. © 2008 HenrikKJ (for larger image see here)

A total of 45 subjects had a CAT (subjects #20, #30, #52, #75, #147, #152, #153, #162, #180, #185, #217, #258, #264, #277, #300, #301) and/or MRI scan (subjects #1, #8, #14, #20, #23, #30, #45, #52, #73, #85, #86, #120, #138, #141, #142, #145, #147, #152, #156, #157, #159, #162, #167, #168, #169, #171, #172, #175, #179, #180, #185, #189, #234, #254, #264, #265, #277, #284, #296, #300, #301) of the brain.

Only six of these neuroradiological examinations yielded a pathological finding (which prompted starrant [subject #138] to comment that "It kind of stinks that something so debilitating is yet so small that it can't be detected"). One subject (#75) recalled: "If I remember correctly, something shows a perfusion problem with my left hemisphere". Unfortunately, it was not possible to obtain a copy of the neuroradiologist's report on this CAT finding. One subject (#152) reported her MRI showing "punctate T2 signal intensities in subcortical areas of white matter". T2-hyperintense foci are one of the most frequent findings in cerebral magnetic resonance imaging. They can pose serious diagnostic problems which is reflected by their English name and abbreviation - UBOs (Unidentified Bright Objects). Although it seems that cerebral white matter lesions are more common in migraineurs than in the general population (Kruit et al., 2004), the nature, association and the clinical significance of these cerebral white matter lesions of migraineurs are not yet conclusive (Dahlof et al., 2005). The MRI of another subject (#189) showed just a single UBO: "Everything was normal except MRI which was 'almost' normal but had a small anomaly that my neurologist thinks is absolutely nothing, the neuroradiologist thinks might be demyelineation or a vascular deformation (or nothing), and I fear could be evidence of CJD" (Creutzfeld-Jakob disease). The last mentioned remark showed that unwarranted interpretations of such UBOs may nurture iatrogenic fears of the patient. The MRI of another subject (#264) showed a single UBO left high frontal in addition to a megacisterna magna, the latter representing an anatomical variant without clinical significance. The MRI of yet another subject (#284) showed "small bright spots" (= UBOs), "but not diagnosed with MS". In one subject (#254), the MRI showed "No significant results, despite the presence of an arachnoid cyst... overlaying the left cerebellar hemisphere".

Multiple episodes of persistent aura require repeated neuroradiological control examinations

"This is why I end up with a CT scan about once a year. They just have to check when I get fun symptoms like one-sided weakness, some paralysis, and my favorite, homonymous hemianopsia. What a fun medical term. There seems to be some trade-off in weirdness of symptoms versus the amount of time since the last CT scan."

(SopuliSusie[subject #405], Yuku forum Visual snow or static - General discussions - migraine WITH infarction, November 10, 2007)

MRI examinations and health insurance status

Sadly, there seems to be an influence of health insurance status on inclusion of the appropriate testing (especially MRI) in the diagnostic workup of VS patients, as illustrated by the following case history of R. from Arkadelphia, Arizona (US). Most insurance companies follow evidence-based guidelines when determining their own coverage. Some insurance companies require brain imaging examinations to be preauthorized. However, it must be noted that many insurance companies will expand coverage to otherwise non-covered diagnoses when the physician documents, on the basis of information like that presented on this webpage, it is in the best interest of the patient to have the exam.

"I'm seeing stars (flashes), floaters, waves, after images, and halos", wrote R., but "I don't get pain with these visual disturbances. Truthfully, I am not even sure if I qualify as having migraine. The symptoms are constant. There is no trigger. They began about 8 years ago; it started with just the floaters and progressed slowly to the point where I also saw the stars, waves, and halos. Except for that, I am a perfectly healthy 20 year old female on no medications. I had an eye exam; the results were negative for everything... The eye doctor told me that nothing helps in these situations. I'm just going to have to live with it since it's not an eye problem. After getting no advice from my eye doctor about what these visual disturbances are, I turned to looking up the symptoms on the internet and, so far, the best fit is an ocular migraine; only without pain and the symptoms are constant. I have never had any brain scans, and probably won't for a long time because I am newly wed and without insurance. I would like to find out the results of your study. If you could, email me if it sounds like I do, or do not have, what you are researching or if you could point me in the right direction. Thank you for doing this research. It's so nice to know that there is someone out there looking into this!"

(R [Subject #48], Email to Sofia Greene, October 10, 2005)

How to obtain a MRI without health insurance

"I was wondering if anyone here is familiar with the experience of trying to get adequate medical help but being too poor and not having insurance of any of that fancy stuff.

How does one get around this wall?

I die inside every time I read something suggestion one see a doctor immediately if they are experiencing this or that symptom. I mean, I'm still a young guy, I've never had insurance of any kind, I don't make much and I can't seem to find a better job. I don't have a doctor of my own to see, so how the heck am I supposed to 'see my doctor'?

Actually, something like an MRI is what I'm most concerned about. I really don't want to sit around and wait to see if my head swells up and I go blind and my hair falls out and God knows what else."

(ohCRICKETS [subject #433], Ezboard forum Visual snow or static - Discussion - Medical Help for the Rest of Us, September 7 and 8, 2007)

"If you are really paranoid about a brain tumor and you have no insurance, you could sign up to be test subject in a research study. If you live near a very large university there are often some studies going on where they need healthy subjects for MRI stuff. Often it is a bit of a commitment, so you can make a few hundred dollars while you are at it. I had a friend help pay his way through a history PhD like this (he did some icky invasive studies also). It's an option if you just want your brain scanned... you probably won't get a diagnosis or anything to go with it though."

(SopuliSusie [subject #405], Ezboard forum Visual snow or static - Discussion - Medical Help for the Rest of Us, September 9, 2007)

SPECT examinations were performed in 2 subjects (#138, #254) with normal results.

This image is one of the first EEGs, appearing in Hans Berger's (1929) first publication on EEG (see here).

EEG recordings were done in 17 subjects (#1, #8, #20, #23, #30, #45, #52, #86, #162, #171, #172, #175, #258, #264, #277, #300, #301). In one subject (#175), the EEG showed "some photosensitivity". This 18-year-old female had a history of 2 generalized epileptic seizures at the age of 14 and 18, respectively. "I have been diagnosed epileptic (2 full out tonic clonic seizures)... Both seizures were the same, as described above, and both were witnessed by sane, reliable adults who described them in detail to medical professionals." In one subject (#8), "One doctor say my EEG is mildly abnormal, but another say it is 'nothing impressive', i.e. normal." One subject (#277) got "3 EEGs - majority of neurologists say abnormal activity in left temporal lobe, and some in right. However, MGH epileptologist says normal and that neurologists who don't specialize in seizures would read it as abnormal. So not sure if normal or abnormal but I've never had an actual seizure like alteration in consciousness or spaced out." Similarly, another subject's (#301) EEG was considered by her neuro-ophthalmologist as showing "a lowered seizure threshold" with "complex partial seizure activity in right occipital and temporal lobe", but her neurologist "said my 48 hour EEG was normal so he thinks the lowered seizure threshold diagnosis is wrong". Sleep deprived EEG was recorded in further 2 subjects (#23, #86), with normal result in one (subject #86) and abnormal finding in the other (subject #23). VEPs were recorded in 7 subjects (#20, #145, #159, #171, #189, #264, #301) with normal result. BAEPs were measured in 3 subjects (#189, #264, #301), also yielding a normal result. Likewise, SEPs to median and tibial nerve stimulation were normal in 2 subjects (#264, #301).

You can't diagnose a seizure solely based on EEG

"Unspecific I guess meaning some spikes and slowing but not seizures. Some people can have this if they are sleep deprived or during a migraine attack. They are saying that there was some activity but not seizure related. EEG's are mainly used to detect seizure activity. Some people can have abnormal EEGs but not epilepsy and that would be normal for them. And on the other hand, some people can have normal EEGs and have a seizure disorder. EEGs are not an exact science. They are only used to help the doctor pinpoint where a seizure is coming from, or if there is brain death. You can't diagnose a seizure solely based on EEG. Patient has to have seizure related symptoms. In my case, I do not have that backup so although there was some activity it is not related to seizures."

(Neurogurl [subject #277], Ezboard forum Visual snow or static – Dioscussion – Palinopsia/Trails question, January 11, 2007)

The end of diagnosis: when to stop testing

"I think that various tests should be conducted when a person first starts to experience visual disturbances, in order to rule out a host of medical problems and diseases. However, speaking as someone who has had batteries of tests performed over a four year period (various types of MRI/various types of EEGs/various x-rays/various blood tests/various eye exams/and many other more specialised tests), I would say that there definitely comes a point when one should stop [see Sonnenberg, 2002]. I say this because these tests are not only hugely expensive in monetary terms, but they take their toll on your general well-being (constantly waiting for test results etc.). Also, many tests are only as good as the person(s) interpreting them, and I have had spurious results and misdiagnoses on more than one occasion because of this. I think that persistent aura is a complex problem that will not show up on any test and the problem is how to deal with the symptoms. The fact that the illness cannot be diagnosed from an x-ray or blood test does add to the general feeling of uncertainty though, and I know that the last time I went for an MRI I was half hoping that maybe a tumour would show up: at least that would have been a tangible diagnosis with a definite outcome. However, maybe the answer is to concentrate more on coping techniques etc., perhaps we could have a sticky detailing useful complementary therapies? Once a MRI, EEG and routine blood tests are done [in addition to ophthalmologic, neurological and psychiatric examinations], I would say stop the testing, unless you know you're at risk from a certain disease, as the stress of undergoing batteries of tests and the risk of misdiagnosis is too great otherwise."

(Jane10 [subject #23], Ezboard forum Visual snow or static – Discussion - Is this coincidental?, January 31, 2007; additions in square brackets by Klaus Podoll)

References

Berger H. Über das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menchen. Archiv für Psychiatrie 1929; 87:527-570. (Berger H. On the Electroencephalogram of Man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1969; Suppl 28: 37-73.)
Dahlof CG, Linton-Dahlof P, Lainez JM, Pascual J. [Is migraine a progressive cerebral disease?] [Article in Spanish]. Neurologia 2005; 356-365.
Kruit MC, van Buchem MA, Hofman PA, Bakkers JT, Terwindt GM, Ferrari MD, Launer LJ. Migraine as a risk factor for subclinical brain lesions. JAMA 2004; 291: 427-434.
Rocca MA, Ceccarelli A, Falini A, Colombo B, Tortorella P, Bernasconi L, Comi G, Scotti G, Filippi M. Brain gray matter changes in migraine patients with T2-visible lesions: a 3-T MRI study. Stroke 2006; 37: 1765-1770.
Sonnenberg A. The end of diagnosis: when to stop testing. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 2002; 97: 2494–2498. [For a full reprint see here].

top top

MIGRAINE CLASSIFICATION  |  MIGRAINE HEADACHE  |  MIGRAINE AURA  |  MIGRAINE ART
About Us |  Contact |  IMPRINT |  Sitemap

Copyright © 2006 Migraine Aura Foundation, All rights reserved.
Thanks to: RAFFELT MEDIENDESIGN and toms-projekte.de | webmaster@migraine-aura.org

zms

http://www.migraine-aura.org/

New On Site Readers' Feedback Honors Terms Of Use Funding How can you help?

 

 

hon code
We subscribe to the HONcode principles. Verify here.

nature proceedings
Pre-publication research on migraine with aura